Burundi vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Burundi
32.58 kg/ha
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
12.47 kg/ha
in 2023
Burundi rank
13th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
14th

Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Burundi
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 32.58 kg/ha against 12.47 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 20.11 kg/ha.

That makes Burundi's figure about 2.6 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th of 176 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 15.21 kg/ha 7.23 kg/ha 7.98 kg/ha Burundi
1970s 13.78 kg/ha 8.17 kg/ha 5.61 kg/ha Burundi
1980s 14.32 kg/ha 7.99 kg/ha 6.33 kg/ha Burundi
1990s 14.4 kg/ha 8.09 kg/ha 6.31 kg/ha Burundi
2000s 11.42 kg/ha 8.96 kg/ha 2.46 kg/ha Burundi
2010s 14.5 kg/ha 11.05 kg/ha 3.45 kg/ha Burundi
2020s 32.89 kg/ha 12.27 kg/ha 20.61 kg/ha Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Burundi or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Burundi, at 32.58 kg/ha against 12.47 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Burundi and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
20.11 kg/ha, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Burundi ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/burundi/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/burundi/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Burundi vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
223 places, 12,870 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).