Costa Rica vs Eritrea, The State of: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Costa Rica
4.63 kg/ha
in 2023
Eritrea, The State of
4.77 kg/ha
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
103rd
Eritrea, The State of rank
100th

Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Eritrea, The State of
4681012196119922023

How they compare

Eritrea, The State of currently reports 4.77 kg/ha against 4.63 kg/ha in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 103rd and Eritrea, The State of ranks 100th of 176 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Eritrea, The State of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Eritrea, The State of Difference Ahead
1990s 7.49 kg/ha 9.27 kg/ha 1.78 kg/ha Eritrea, The State of
2000s 6.62 kg/ha 5.9 kg/ha 0.7221 kg/ha Costa Rica
2010s 6.61 kg/ha 4.75 kg/ha 1.85 kg/ha Costa Rica
2020s 5.1 kg/ha 4.74 kg/ha 0.3553 kg/ha Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Costa Rica or Eritrea, The State of?
Eritrea, The State of, at 4.77 kg/ha against 4.63 kg/ha in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Costa Rica and Eritrea, The State of?
0.14 kg/ha, with Eritrea, The State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Eritrea, The State of?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Eritrea, The State of rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Costa Rica ranks 103rd and Eritrea, The State of ranks 100th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Eritrea, The State of: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/costa-rica/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/costa-rica/eritrea/">Costa Rica vs Eritrea, The State of: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
223 places, 12,870 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).