Ethiopia PDR vs Pakistan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Pakistan
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 5.9 kg/ha against 5.64 kg/ha in Pakistan, a difference of 0.26 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 91st and Pakistan ranks 93rd of 176 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.84 kg/ha | 4.45 kg/ha | 0.3878 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 4.83 kg/ha | 4.89 kg/ha | 0.0601 kg/ha | Pakistan |
| 1980s | 5.45 kg/ha | 5.05 kg/ha | 0.3955 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 6.27 kg/ha | 5.76 kg/ha | 0.5129 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Pakistan?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 5.9 kg/ha against 5.64 kg/ha in Pakistan as of 1992.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Pakistan?
- 0.26 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Pakistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Pakistan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 91st and Pakistan ranks 93rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).