Ethiopia vs Philippines: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Philippines
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 12.63 kg/ha against 12.25 kg/ha in Philippines, a difference of 0.38 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Philippines ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 47th and Philippines ranks 49th of 191 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.24 kg/ha | 11.06 kg/ha | 4.82 kg/ha | Philippines |
| 2000s | 8.66 kg/ha | 12.04 kg/ha | 3.37 kg/ha | Philippines |
| 2010s | 11.91 kg/ha | 12.18 kg/ha | 0.277 kg/ha | Philippines |
| 2020s | 12.18 kg/ha | 12.23 kg/ha | 0.0459 kg/ha | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ethiopia or Philippines?
- Ethiopia, at 12.63 kg/ha against 12.25 kg/ha in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ethiopia and Philippines?
- 0.38 kg/ha, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Philippines?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Philippines rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 47th and Philippines ranks 49th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).