Kuwait vs Malta: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kuwait
- Malta
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 0 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Malta, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Kuwait ranks 186th and Malta ranks 186th of 191 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kg/ha | 9.79 kg/ha | 9.79 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1970s | 0 kg/ha | 5.81 kg/ha | 5.81 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1980s | 0 kg/ha | 5.83 kg/ha | 5.83 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1990s | 0 kg/ha | 9.53 kg/ha | 9.53 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2000s | 0 kg/ha | 11.37 kg/ha | 11.37 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 kg/ha | 8.05 kg/ha | 8.05 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kuwait or Malta?
- Kuwait, at 0 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kuwait and Malta?
- 0 kg/ha, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and Malta rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kuwait ranks 186th and Malta ranks 186th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).