Malta vs Singapore: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Malta
- Singapore
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Singapore, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 186th and Singapore ranks 186th of 191 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.79 kg/ha | 0.0293 kg/ha | 9.76 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1970s | 5.81 kg/ha | 0.3163 kg/ha | 5.49 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1980s | 5.83 kg/ha | 0.1552 kg/ha | 5.68 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1990s | 9.53 kg/ha | 0.0025 kg/ha | 9.52 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2000s | 11.37 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 11.37 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 8.05 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 8.05 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Malta or Singapore?
- Malta, at 0 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Singapore as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Malta and Singapore?
- 0 kg/ha, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Singapore?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Singapore rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Malta ranks 186th and Singapore ranks 186th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).