Algeria vs Czechia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen

Algeria
10,671 t
in 2023
Czechia
10,336 t
in 2023
Algeria rank
93rd
Czechia rank
94th

Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Algeria
  • Czechia
2.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 10,671 t against 10,336 t in Czechia, a difference of 335 t.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Algeria ranks 93rd and Czechia ranks 94th of 191 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 2 and Czechia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Czechia Difference Ahead
1990s 5,039 t 9,059 t 4,020 t Czechia
2000s 4,924 t 5,369 t 444.83 t Czechia
2010s 8,478 t 5,551 t 2,927 t Algeria
2020s 9,827 t 9,486 t 340.98 t Algeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Algeria or Czechia?
Algeria, at 10,671 t against 10,336 t in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Algeria and Czechia?
335 t, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Czechia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Algeria and Czechia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
Algeria ranks 93rd and Czechia ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
223 places, 12,870 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).