Antigua and Barbuda vs Kuwait: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Kuwait
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Kuwait, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 186th and Kuwait ranks 186th of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 74.91 t | 0 t | 74.91 t | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1970s | 11.85 t | 0 t | 11.85 t | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1980s | 0.5425 t | 0 t | 0.5425 t | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1990s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2000s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Antigua and Barbuda or Kuwait?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 0 t against 0 t in Kuwait as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Antigua and Barbuda and Kuwait?
- 0 t, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Kuwait?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Kuwait rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 186th and Kuwait ranks 186th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).