Argentina vs Russian Federation: Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Argentina
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 2.19 million t against 690,363 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 1.50 million t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 3.2 times Russian Federation's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 5th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.05 million t | 176,949 t | 874,599 t | Argentina |
| 2000s | 2.44 million t | 157,754 t | 2.28 million t | Argentina |
| 2010s | 3.48 million t | 361,925 t | 3.12 million t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 2.94 million t | 598,991 t | 2.34 million t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation β cropland nitrogen, Argentina or Russian Federation?
- Argentina, at 2.19 million t against 690,363 t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation β cropland nitrogen between Argentina and Russian Federation?
- 1.50 million t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Russian Federation rank globally for biological fixation β cropland nitrogen?
- Argentina ranks 5th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).