Armenia vs Bahamas: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Armenia
- Bahamas
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 124.69 t against 91.44 t in Bahamas, a difference of 33.25 t.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.4 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bahamas ahead.
Armenia ranks 166th and Bahamas ranks 169th of 191 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Bahamas | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 151.06 t | 79.73 t | 71.33 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 176.95 t | 81.48 t | 95.47 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 191.34 t | 87.54 t | 103.8 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 153.55 t | 91.05 t | 62.5 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Armenia or Bahamas?
- Armenia, at 124.69 t against 91.44 t in Bahamas as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Armenia and Bahamas?
- 33.25 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Bahamas?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Bahamas rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Armenia ranks 166th and Bahamas ranks 169th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).