Austria vs Belarus: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Austria
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 16,219 t against 15,512 t in Austria, a difference of 707 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 83rd and Belarus ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,005 t | 14,750 t | 2,745 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 8,463 t | 16,905 t | 8,442 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 9,996 t | 17,854 t | 7,857 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 14,153 t | 16,579 t | 2,427 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Austria or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 16,219 t against 15,512 t in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Austria and Belarus?
- 707 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belarus?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Belarus rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Austria ranks 83rd and Belarus ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).