Austria vs Guatemala: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Austria
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 20,513 t against 15,512 t in Austria, a difference of 5,001 t.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.3 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.
Austria ranks 83rd and Guatemala ranks 80th of 191 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 885.14 t | 4,836 t | 3,950 t | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 441.01 t | 6,561 t | 6,120 t | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 4,076 t | 9,459 t | 5,383 t | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 11,931 t | 13,945 t | 2,015 t | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 8,463 t | 18,947 t | 10,484 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 9,996 t | 24,054 t | 14,058 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 14,153 t | 19,854 t | 5,702 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Austria or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 20,513 t against 15,512 t in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Austria and Guatemala?
- 5,001 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Guatemala?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Guatemala rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Austria ranks 83rd and Guatemala ranks 80th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).