Bahamas vs Mongolia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bahamas
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 108.06 t against 91.44 t in Bahamas, a difference of 16.62 t.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.
Bahamas ranks 169th and Mongolia ranks 167th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 75.15 t | 149.63 t | 74.48 t | Mongolia |
| 1970s | 124.14 t | 118.73 t | 5.41 t | Bahamas |
| 1980s | 138.9 t | 122.87 t | 16.04 t | Bahamas |
| 1990s | 90.59 t | 121.16 t | 30.57 t | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 81.48 t | 95.48 t | 14.01 t | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 87.54 t | 107.88 t | 20.34 t | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 91.05 t | 107.44 t | 16.4 t | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Bahamas or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 108.06 t against 91.44 t in Bahamas as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Bahamas and Mongolia?
- 16.62 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Mongolia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Mongolia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Bahamas ranks 169th and Mongolia ranks 167th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).