Bangladesh vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen

Bangladesh
356,615 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2.29 million t
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
14th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
13th

Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 2.29 million t against 356,615 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 1.93 million t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 6.4 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 14th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 13th of 191 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 260,775 t 371,283 t 110,508 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 295,301 t 437,558 t 142,257 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 309,446 t 504,817 t 195,371 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 303,631 t 660,181 t 356,550 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 301,616 t 1.07 million t 771,106 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 322,272 t 1.81 million t 1.49 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 350,894 t 2.14 million t 1.79 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Bangladesh or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 2.29 million t against 356,615 t in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Bangladesh and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
1.93 million t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
Bangladesh ranks 14th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 13th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen/bangladesh/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/biological-fixation-cropland-nitrogen/bangladesh/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Bangladesh vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
223 places, 12,870 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).