Belgium-Luxembourg vs Mauritius: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 918.41 t against 833.57 t in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 84.84 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 147th and Mauritius ranks 144th of 191 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium-Luxembourg | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,798 t | 2,064 t | 265.95 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 660.49 t | 2,081 t | 1,421 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 501.05 t | 2,056 t | 1,555 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 1,091 t | 1,899 t | 807.76 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Belgium-Luxembourg or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 918.41 t against 833.57 t in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Belgium-Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 84.84 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Mauritius rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 147th and Mauritius ranks 144th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).