Belgium vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belgium
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3,354 t against 2,602 t in Belgium, a difference of 752 t.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.3 times Belgium's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 113th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 111th of 176 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 414.87 t | 1,512 t | 1,097 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 493.67 t | 1,755 t | 1,261 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 2,061 t | 3,005 t | 943.24 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Belgium or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3,354 t against 2,602 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Belgium and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 752 t, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Belgium ranks 113th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 111th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).