Belgium vs Eritrea: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belgium
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 3,299 t against 2,602 t in Belgium, a difference of 697 t.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.3 times Belgium's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 125th and Eritrea ranks 123rd of 191 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 414.87 t | 3,622 t | 3,208 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 493.67 t | 3,290 t | 2,796 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 2,061 t | 3,282 t | 1,220 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Belgium or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 3,299 t against 2,602 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Belgium and Eritrea?
- 697 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Eritrea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Eritrea rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Belgium ranks 125th and Eritrea ranks 123rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).