Bhutan vs Norway: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bhutan
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 468.15 t against 430.52 t in Bhutan, a difference of 37.63 t.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 157th and Norway ranks 154th of 191 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 609.26 t | 3.25 t | 606.01 t | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 793.07 t | 0 t | 793.07 t | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 1,195 t | 0 t | 1,195 t | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 834.83 t | 0 t | 834.83 t | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 840.17 t | 207.45 t | 632.72 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 757.55 t | 228.07 t | 529.48 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 473.11 t | 395.5 t | 77.61 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Bhutan or Norway?
- Norway, at 468.15 t against 430.52 t in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Bhutan and Norway?
- 37.63 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Norway?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Norway rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Bhutan ranks 157th and Norway ranks 154th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).