Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eritrea: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Eritrea
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3,354 t against 3,299 t in Eritrea, a difference of 55 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 111th and Eritrea ranks 112th of 176 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,383 t | 4,098 t | 2,715 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1,512 t | 3,622 t | 2,110 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 1,755 t | 3,290 t | 1,535 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 3,005 t | 3,282 t | 276.87 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Eritrea?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3,354 t against 3,299 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eritrea?
- 55 t, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eritrea rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 111th and Eritrea ranks 112th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).