Burkina Faso vs Mexico: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Burkina Faso
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 92,949 t against 89,232 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 3,717 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Mexico ranks 32nd of 176 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11,967 t | 97,816 t | 85,848 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 13,449 t | 131,081 t | 117,633 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 15,297 t | 156,949 t | 141,652 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 24,046 t | 139,029 t | 114,983 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 35,021 t | 114,762 t | 79,742 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 48,134 t | 129,953 t | 81,819 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 80,213 t | 116,806 t | 36,593 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Burkina Faso or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 92,949 t against 89,232 t in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Burkina Faso and Mexico?
- 3,717 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Mexico rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Burkina Faso ranks 34th and Mexico ranks 32nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).