Burundi vs Colombia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Burundi
- Colombia
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 54,449 t against 49,646 t in Colombia, a difference of 4,803 t.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.
Burundi ranks 56th and Colombia ranks 59th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Colombia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15,286 t | 26,110 t | 10,825 t | Colombia |
| 1970s | 16,876 t | 32,830 t | 15,954 t | Colombia |
| 1980s | 18,088 t | 37,373 t | 19,285 t | Colombia |
| 1990s | 18,766 t | 38,132 t | 19,366 t | Colombia |
| 2000s | 15,349 t | 36,583 t | 21,233 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 21,249 t | 40,079 t | 18,829 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 53,691 t | 44,621 t | 9,070 t | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Burundi or Colombia?
- Burundi, at 54,449 t against 49,646 t in Colombia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Burundi and Colombia?
- 4,803 t, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Colombia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Colombia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Burundi ranks 56th and Colombia ranks 59th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).