Burundi vs Japan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Burundi
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 61,989 t against 54,449 t in Burundi, a difference of 7,540 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 51st and Japan ranks 48th of 176 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15,286 t | 127,441 t | 112,155 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 16,876 t | 94,840 t | 77,964 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 18,088 t | 86,223 t | 68,134 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 18,766 t | 71,360 t | 52,594 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 15,349 t | 67,660 t | 52,311 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 21,249 t | 63,627 t | 42,377 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 53,691 t | 61,866 t | 8,175 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Burundi or Japan?
- Japan, at 61,989 t against 54,449 t in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Burundi and Japan?
- 7,540 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Japan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Burundi ranks 51st and Japan ranks 48th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).