Cabo Verde vs Kenya: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cabo Verde
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 98,850 t against 945.61 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 97,904 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 104.5 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Kenya ranks 30th of 29 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 574.1 t | 27,813 t | 27,239 t | Kenya |
| 1970s | 128.3 t | 37,280 t | 37,152 t | Kenya |
| 1980s | 822.65 t | 42,687 t | 41,864 t | Kenya |
| 1990s | 742.71 t | 53,965 t | 53,222 t | Kenya |
| 2000s | 874.01 t | 49,434 t | 48,560 t | Kenya |
| 2010s | 901.38 t | 76,383 t | 75,482 t | Kenya |
| 2020s | 943.02 t | 84,915 t | 83,972 t | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Cabo Verde or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 98,850 t against 945.61 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Cabo Verde and Kenya?
- 97,904 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Kenya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Kenya rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Kenya ranks 30th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).