Cabo Verde vs Lebanon: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cabo Verde
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 1,117 t against 945.61 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 171.39 t.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.2 times Cabo Verde's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lebanon ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 141st and Lebanon ranks 139th of 191 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 574.1 t | 1,142 t | 567.95 t | Lebanon |
| 1970s | 128.3 t | 1,221 t | 1,093 t | Lebanon |
| 1980s | 822.65 t | 1,227 t | 404.71 t | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 742.71 t | 2,472 t | 1,729 t | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 874.01 t | 1,175 t | 300.98 t | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 901.38 t | 1,134 t | 232.28 t | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 943.02 t | 1,206 t | 263.27 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Cabo Verde or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 1,117 t against 945.61 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Cabo Verde and Lebanon?
- 171.39 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Lebanon rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cabo Verde ranks 141st and Lebanon ranks 139th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).