Cabo Verde vs Mauritius: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cabo Verde
- Mauritius
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 945.61 t against 918.41 t in Mauritius, a difference of 27.2 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 141st and Mauritius ranks 144th of 191 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 574.1 t | 2,064 t | 1,490 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 128.3 t | 2,081 t | 1,953 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 822.65 t | 2,056 t | 1,233 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 742.71 t | 1,899 t | 1,157 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 874.01 t | 1,731 t | 856.84 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 901.38 t | 1,329 t | 427.93 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 943.02 t | 1,025 t | 82.38 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Cabo Verde or Mauritius?
- Cabo Verde, at 945.61 t against 918.41 t in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Cabo Verde and Mauritius?
- 27.2 t, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Mauritius rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cabo Verde ranks 141st and Mauritius ranks 144th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).