Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Colombia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 49,646 t against 39,718 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 9,928 t.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 59th and Zimbabwe ranks 61st of 191 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 26,110 t | 14,034 t | 12,076 t | Colombia |
| 1970s | 32,830 t | 19,958 t | 12,872 t | Colombia |
| 1980s | 37,373 t | 22,216 t | 15,157 t | Colombia |
| 1990s | 38,132 t | 21,500 t | 16,632 t | Colombia |
| 2000s | 36,583 t | 24,109 t | 12,474 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 40,079 t | 24,211 t | 15,868 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 44,621 t | 29,184 t | 15,437 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Colombia or Zimbabwe?
- Colombia, at 49,646 t against 39,718 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
- 9,928 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Colombia ranks 59th and Zimbabwe ranks 61st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).