Comoros vs Suriname: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Comoros
- Suriname
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 1,378 t against 1,306 t in Suriname, a difference of 72 t.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.
Comoros ranks 135th and Suriname ranks 136th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 360.25 t | 897.48 t | 537.23 t | Suriname |
| 1970s | 439.96 t | 1,262 t | 822.26 t | Suriname |
| 1980s | 793.14 t | 1,895 t | 1,102 t | Suriname |
| 1990s | 938.18 t | 1,546 t | 607.45 t | Suriname |
| 2000s | 1,791 t | 1,249 t | 541.68 t | Comoros |
| 2010s | 2,094 t | 1,532 t | 561.93 t | Comoros |
| 2020s | 1,403 t | 1,393 t | 9.61 t | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Comoros or Suriname?
- Comoros, at 1,378 t against 1,306 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Comoros and Suriname?
- 72 t, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Suriname rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Comoros ranks 135th and Suriname ranks 136th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).