Cuba vs Czechia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cuba
- Czechia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 10,791 t against 10,336 t in Czechia, a difference of 455 t.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 91st and Czechia ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37,108 t | 9,059 t | 28,049 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 26,124 t | 5,369 t | 20,756 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 20,306 t | 5,551 t | 14,755 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 13,036 t | 9,486 t | 3,549 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Czechia?
- Cuba, at 10,791 t against 10,336 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Czechia?
- 455 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Czechia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cuba ranks 91st and Czechia ranks 94th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).