Cuba vs Greece: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cuba
- Greece
How they compare
Greece currently reports 12,446 t against 10,791 t in Cuba, a difference of 1,655 t.
That makes Greece's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 91st and Greece ranks 88th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Greece in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 32,181 t | 12,066 t | 20,115 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 37,630 t | 8,045 t | 29,585 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 39,010 t | 5,343 t | 33,667 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 38,715 t | 3,573 t | 35,142 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 26,124 t | 3,147 t | 22,978 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 20,306 t | 7,056 t | 13,250 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 13,036 t | 14,111 t | 1,075 t | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Greece?
- Greece, at 12,446 t against 10,791 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Greece?
- 1,655 t, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Greece?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Greece rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cuba ranks 91st and Greece ranks 88th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).