Cyprus vs Maldives: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cyprus
- Maldives
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 35.17 t against 8.11 t in Maldives, a difference of 27.06 t.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 4.3 times Maldives's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 176th and Maldives ranks 179th of 191 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,023 t | 2.68 t | 1,020 t | Cyprus |
| 1970s | 745.85 t | 2.68 t | 743.17 t | Cyprus |
| 1980s | 397.91 t | 3.67 t | 394.24 t | Cyprus |
| 1990s | 197.99 t | 4.74 t | 193.26 t | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 111.64 t | 4.97 t | 106.67 t | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 61.57 t | 7.64 t | 53.93 t | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 33.84 t | 8.1 t | 25.75 t | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Cyprus or Maldives?
- Cyprus, at 35.17 t against 8.11 t in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Cyprus and Maldives?
- 27.06 t, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Maldives?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Maldives rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cyprus ranks 176th and Maldives ranks 179th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).