Cyprus vs Puerto Rico: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cyprus
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 43.06 t against 35.17 t in Cyprus, a difference of 7.89 t.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.2 times Cyprus's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Cyprus ranks 176th and Puerto Rico ranks 174th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 2 and Puerto Rico in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,023 t | 3,756 t | 2,733 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 745.85 t | 2,067 t | 1,321 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 397.91 t | 1,278 t | 879.9 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 197.99 t | 527.89 t | 329.9 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 111.64 t | 61.21 t | 50.42 t | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 61.57 t | 45.55 t | 16.02 t | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 33.84 t | 40.32 t | 6.47 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Cyprus or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 43.06 t against 35.17 t in Cyprus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Cyprus and Puerto Rico?
- 7.89 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Puerto Rico rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cyprus ranks 176th and Puerto Rico ranks 174th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).