Denmark vs Uzbekistan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Denmark
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 8,342 t against 7,708 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 634 t.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 102nd and Uzbekistan ranks 105th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18,610 t | 5,993 t | 12,618 t | Denmark |
| 2000s | 4,276 t | 3,622 t | 653.32 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 3,029 t | 6,051 t | 3,022 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 8,150 t | 8,487 t | 337.04 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Denmark or Uzbekistan?
- Denmark, at 8,342 t against 7,708 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Denmark and Uzbekistan?
- 634 t, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Denmark and Uzbekistan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Denmark ranks 102nd and Uzbekistan ranks 105th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).