Dominica vs Puerto Rico: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominica
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 43.06 t against 20.6 t in Dominica, a difference of 22.46 t.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 2.1 times Dominica's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 163rd and Puerto Rico ranks 160th of 176 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14.03 t | 3,756 t | 3,742 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 14.43 t | 2,067 t | 2,052 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 15.15 t | 1,278 t | 1,263 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 13.26 t | 527.89 t | 514.63 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 14.24 t | 61.21 t | 46.97 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 19.83 t | 45.55 t | 25.72 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 20.51 t | 40.32 t | 19.81 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Dominica or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 43.06 t against 20.6 t in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Dominica and Puerto Rico?
- 22.46 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Puerto Rico rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Dominica ranks 163rd and Puerto Rico ranks 160th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).