Ecuador vs Haiti: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ecuador
- Haiti
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 13,197 t against 11,423 t in Haiti, a difference of 1,774 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Haiti's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 87th and Haiti ranks 89th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Haiti in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11,520 t | 6,148 t | 5,372 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 10,734 t | 7,730 t | 3,004 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 16,387 t | 10,772 t | 5,615 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 22,849 t | 7,665 t | 15,184 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 21,562 t | 12,336 t | 9,225 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 17,992 t | 22,377 t | 4,386 t | Haiti |
| 2020s | 15,200 t | 13,341 t | 1,859 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Ecuador or Haiti?
- Ecuador, at 13,197 t against 11,423 t in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Ecuador and Haiti?
- 1,774 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Haiti?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Haiti rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Ecuador ranks 87th and Haiti ranks 89th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).