El Salvador vs Sweden: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- El Salvador
- Sweden
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 7,031 t against 7,008 t in Sweden, a difference of 23 t.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
El Salvador ranks 97th and Sweden ranks 98th of 176 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 4 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,981 t | 1,158 t | 822.79 t | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 3,151 t | 1,250 t | 1,901 t | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 3,447 t | 5,650 t | 2,203 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 4,838 t | 4,605 t | 233.36 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 5,786 t | 4,618 t | 1,169 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 7,174 t | 7,984 t | 810.16 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 6,893 t | 8,069 t | 1,176 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, El Salvador or Sweden?
- El Salvador, at 7,031 t against 7,008 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between El Salvador and Sweden?
- 23 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Sweden rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- El Salvador ranks 97th and Sweden ranks 98th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).