Eritrea vs Melanesia: Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eritrea
- Melanesia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 3,299 t against 2,607 t in Melanesia, a difference of 692 t.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.3 times Melanesia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 123rd and Melanesia ranks 124th of 191 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,098 t | 2,919 t | 1,179 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 3,622 t | 2,756 t | 866.32 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 3,290 t | 2,734 t | 555.37 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 3,282 t | 2,695 t | 586.05 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation β cropland nitrogen, Eritrea or Melanesia?
- Eritrea, at 3,299 t against 2,607 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation β cropland nitrogen between Eritrea and Melanesia?
- 692 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Melanesia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Melanesia rank globally for biological fixation β cropland nitrogen?
- Eritrea ranks 123rd and Melanesia ranks 124th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).