Estonia vs Liberia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Estonia
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 8,284 t against 7,682 t in Estonia, a difference of 602 t.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Liberia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 106th and Liberia ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 386.46 t | 4,232 t | 3,846 t | Liberia |
| 2000s | 397.09 t | 5,774 t | 5,377 t | Liberia |
| 2010s | 3,458 t | 8,352 t | 4,895 t | Liberia |
| 2020s | 7,219 t | 8,423 t | 1,204 t | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Estonia or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 8,284 t against 7,682 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Estonia and Liberia?
- 602 t, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Liberia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Liberia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Estonia ranks 106th and Liberia ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).