Estonia vs Sweden: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Estonia
- Sweden
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 7,682 t against 7,008 t in Sweden, a difference of 674 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sweden ahead.
Estonia ranks 106th and Sweden ranks 108th of 191 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 386.46 t | 4,544 t | 4,158 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 397.09 t | 4,618 t | 4,221 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 3,458 t | 7,984 t | 4,526 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 7,219 t | 8,069 t | 849.8 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Estonia or Sweden?
- Estonia, at 7,682 t against 7,008 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Estonia and Sweden?
- 674 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Sweden?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Sweden rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Estonia ranks 106th and Sweden ranks 108th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).