Estonia vs Uzbekistan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Estonia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 7,708 t against 7,682 t in Estonia, a difference of 26 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Estonia ranks 96th and Uzbekistan ranks 95th of 176 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 386.46 t | 5,993 t | 5,606 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 397.09 t | 3,622 t | 3,225 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 3,458 t | 6,051 t | 2,593 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 7,219 t | 8,487 t | 1,268 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Estonia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 7,708 t against 7,682 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Estonia and Uzbekistan?
- 26 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Uzbekistan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Estonia ranks 96th and Uzbekistan ranks 95th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).