Eswatini vs Turkmenistan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eswatini
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1,954 t against 1,845 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 109 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 116th and Turkmenistan ranks 118th of 176 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,691 t | 1,198 t | 493.2 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 1,804 t | 1,733 t | 70.89 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1,944 t | 1,672 t | 272.32 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1,938 t | 1,801 t | 136.41 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Eswatini or Turkmenistan?
- Eswatini, at 1,954 t against 1,845 t in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Eswatini and Turkmenistan?
- 109 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Turkmenistan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Eswatini ranks 116th and Turkmenistan ranks 118th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).