Ethiopia PDR vs Mali: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 75,861 t against 66,720 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 9,141 t.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 44th and Mali ranks 41st of 176 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 60,198 t | 18,082 t | 42,116 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 66,019 t | 22,759 t | 43,260 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 69,307 t | 16,624 t | 52,683 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 71,118 t | 23,707 t | 47,412 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia PDR or Mali?
- Mali, at 75,861 t against 66,720 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia PDR and Mali?
- 9,141 t, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Mali?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Mali rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 44th and Mali ranks 41st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).