Fiji vs Papua New Guinea: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Fiji
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 935.83 t against 835.64 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 100.19 t.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 130th and Papua New Guinea ranks 133rd of 176 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,361 t | 308.58 t | 1,053 t | Fiji |
| 1970s | 1,512 t | 277.53 t | 1,234 t | Fiji |
| 1980s | 1,978 t | 356.99 t | 1,621 t | Fiji |
| 1990s | 2,068 t | 472.36 t | 1,595 t | Fiji |
| 2000s | 1,671 t | 566.72 t | 1,104 t | Fiji |
| 2010s | 1,273 t | 751.42 t | 521.91 t | Fiji |
| 2020s | 1,105 t | 835.81 t | 269.22 t | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Fiji or Papua New Guinea?
- Fiji, at 935.83 t against 835.64 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Fiji and Papua New Guinea?
- 100.19 t, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Papua New Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Papua New Guinea rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Fiji ranks 130th and Papua New Guinea ranks 133rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).