Fiji vs Saudi Arabia: Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Fiji
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 968.43 t against 935.83 t in Fiji, a difference of 32.6 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 143rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 140th of 191 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,361 t | 236.36 t | 1,125 t | Fiji |
| 1970s | 1,512 t | 339.39 t | 1,173 t | Fiji |
| 1980s | 1,978 t | 443.44 t | 1,534 t | Fiji |
| 1990s | 2,068 t | 716.4 t | 1,351 t | Fiji |
| 2000s | 1,671 t | 798.76 t | 872.12 t | Fiji |
| 2010s | 1,273 t | 921.61 t | 351.71 t | Fiji |
| 2020s | 1,105 t | 967.94 t | 137.09 t | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation β cropland nitrogen, Fiji or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 968.43 t against 935.83 t in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation β cropland nitrogen between Fiji and Saudi Arabia?
- 32.6 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Saudi Arabia rank globally for biological fixation β cropland nitrogen?
- Fiji ranks 143rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 140th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).