Georgia vs Guadeloupe: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Georgia
- Guadeloupe
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 379.28 t against 318.18 t in Guadeloupe, a difference of 61.1 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Guadeloupe's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 159th and Guadeloupe ranks 160th of 191 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Guadeloupe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 616.61 t | 322.91 t | 293.7 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 711.62 t | 317.8 t | 393.82 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 478.32 t | 318.18 t | 160.15 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 401.95 t | 318.18 t | 83.77 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Georgia or Guadeloupe?
- Georgia, at 379.28 t against 318.18 t in Guadeloupe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Georgia and Guadeloupe?
- 61.1 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Guadeloupe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Guadeloupe rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Georgia ranks 159th and Guadeloupe ranks 160th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).