Georgia vs Lesotho: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Georgia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 432.19 t against 379.28 t in Georgia, a difference of 52.91 t.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 159th and Lesotho ranks 156th of 191 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Lesotho in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 616.61 t | 565.99 t | 50.62 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 711.62 t | 570.42 t | 141.2 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 478.32 t | 394.09 t | 84.23 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 401.95 t | 514.77 t | 112.82 t | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Georgia or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 432.19 t against 379.28 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Georgia and Lesotho?
- 52.91 t, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Lesotho?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Lesotho rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Georgia ranks 159th and Lesotho ranks 156th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).