Germany vs Rwanda: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Germany
- Rwanda
How they compare
Germany currently reports 38,744 t against 32,550 t in Rwanda, a difference of 6,194 t.
That makes Germany's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Germany ahead.
Germany ranks 64th and Rwanda ranks 67th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,563 t | 9,606 t | 7,957 t | Germany |
| 1970s | 10,644 t | 13,438 t | 2,794 t | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 17,534 t | 16,443 t | 1,092 t | Germany |
| 1990s | 24,334 t | 11,220 t | 13,114 t | Germany |
| 2000s | 27,030 t | 20,282 t | 6,748 t | Germany |
| 2010s | 24,464 t | 29,315 t | 4,851 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 41,675 t | 32,915 t | 8,760 t | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Germany or Rwanda?
- Germany, at 38,744 t against 32,550 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Germany and Rwanda?
- 6,194 t, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Germany and Rwanda rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Germany ranks 64th and Rwanda ranks 67th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).