Grenada vs Qatar: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Grenada
- Qatar
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 84.02 t against 54.81 t in Qatar, a difference of 29.21 t.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.5 times Qatar's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 156th and Qatar ranks 159th of 176 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 135.43 t | 48.2 t | 87.23 t | Grenada |
| 1970s | 123.4 t | 48.2 t | 75.2 t | Grenada |
| 1980s | 107.15 t | 48.2 t | 58.95 t | Grenada |
| 1990s | 97.37 t | 48.2 t | 49.16 t | Grenada |
| 2000s | 98.56 t | 48.2 t | 50.35 t | Grenada |
| 2010s | 109.27 t | 48.2 t | 61.06 t | Grenada |
| 2020s | 82.49 t | 50.78 t | 31.71 t | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Grenada or Qatar?
- Grenada, at 84.02 t against 54.81 t in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Grenada and Qatar?
- 29.21 t, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Qatar rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Grenada ranks 156th and Qatar ranks 159th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).