Guinea vs Pakistan: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guinea
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 174,957 t against 148,465 t in Guinea, a difference of 26,492 t.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Guinea's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 26th and Pakistan ranks 23rd of 191 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,666 t | 140,252 t | 125,585 t | Pakistan |
| 1970s | 17,994 t | 151,313 t | 133,319 t | Pakistan |
| 1980s | 21,313 t | 159,898 t | 138,585 t | Pakistan |
| 1990s | 30,722 t | 179,130 t | 148,408 t | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 42,977 t | 181,138 t | 138,161 t | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 91,990 t | 167,913 t | 75,923 t | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 133,201 t | 177,653 t | 44,452 t | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Guinea or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 174,957 t against 148,465 t in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Guinea and Pakistan?
- 26,492 t, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Pakistan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and Pakistan rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Guinea ranks 26th and Pakistan ranks 23rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).