Guinea vs Sudan (former): Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guinea
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 153,007 t against 148,465 t in Guinea, a difference of 4,542 t.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 26th and Sudan (former) ranks 24th of 191 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,666 t | 37,037 t | 22,371 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 17,994 t | 74,619 t | 56,625 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 21,313 t | 61,838 t | 40,525 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 30,722 t | 82,654 t | 51,932 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 42,977 t | 104,096 t | 61,120 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 67,987 t | 130,851 t | 62,864 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Guinea or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 153,007 t against 148,465 t in Guinea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Guinea and Sudan (former)?
- 4,542 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Guinea and Sudan (former) rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Guinea ranks 26th and Sudan (former) ranks 24th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).