Hungary vs Tunisia: Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen
Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Hungary
- Tunisia
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 9,864 t against 9,469 t in Tunisia, a difference of 395 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 96th and Tunisia ranks 98th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 6 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,682 t | 3,724 t | 6,958 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 10,255 t | 7,021 t | 3,233 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 18,656 t | 7,296 t | 11,359 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 13,650 t | 6,800 t | 6,850 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 6,622 t | 6,744 t | 121.51 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 9,542 t | 9,093 t | 449.3 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 9,626 t | 9,091 t | 534.75 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher biological fixation — cropland nitrogen, Hungary or Tunisia?
- Hungary, at 9,864 t against 9,469 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in biological fixation — cropland nitrogen between Hungary and Tunisia?
- 395 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Tunisia rank globally for biological fixation — cropland nitrogen?
- Hungary ranks 96th and Tunisia ranks 98th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Biological fixation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).